| V1 |
DDA STUDY NUMBER |
| V2 |
DDA YEAR |
| V3 |
Omnibus number |
| V4 |
Sequence number |
| V5 |
Duplicate indicator/weight variable |
| V6 |
1. Urbanization |
| V7 |
7. Month |
| V8 |
8A. Sex |
| V9 |
8B. Age |
| V10 |
8C. Marital status |
| V11 |
9. Occupational status for respondent |
| V12 |
10. Income of family |
| V13 |
11A. Supporters occupation |
| V14 |
11B. Schooling of respondent |
| V15 |
13. Social group |
| V16 |
17-18. For which party would you vote in case of general election tomorrow? |
| V17 |
10. Income of family |
| V18 |
12a. Urbanization |
| V19 |
12b. Age |
| V20 |
41. Do you think that the present government has done well, relatively well, or poorly during the time that it has been in power? |
| V21 |
42a. The government i.e. minister for culture Hans Sølvhøj has, from a suggestion from Artists Fond, recommended several artists for an honorary gift from the state. Some of these gifts consist of a permanent yearly income of 30.er and others of lesser amounts. Totally there will be given out approximately 2 million Kroner. These gifts of state support to artists has been criticized by many through letters of protest to the government. Have you heard of these gifts? |
| V22 |
42b. Are you a supporter or an opposer of these gifts to artists? |
| V23 |
43. (If supporter) - Why? Art should be preserved/ art has a future |
| V24 |
43. (If supporter) - Why? Amounts too large |
| V25 |
43. (If supporter) - Why? In some individual cases necessary |
| V26 |
43. (If supporter) - Why? Art should be supported, but in another manner |
| V27 |
43. (If supporter) - Why? Within reason |
| V28 |
43. (If supporter) - Why? Other |
| V29 |
43. (If supporter) - Why? Dont know |
| V30 |
44. (If opposer) - Why? Do not understand art |
| V31 |
44. (If opposer) - Why? Amounts too large |
| V32 |
44. (If opposer) - Why? Only for the artists who need it |
| V33 |
44. (If opposer) - Why? Should be supported in another manner |
| V34 |
44. (If opposer) - Why? In the form of legacy/not permanent salary |
| V35 |
44. (If opposer) - Why? The state cannot afford it |
| V36 |
44. (If opposer) - Why? They must look after themselves/meaningless |
| V37 |
44. (If opposer) - Why? More important things to use money for |
| V38 |
44. (If opposer) - Why? Others |
| V39 |
44. (If opposer) - Why? Dont know |
| V40 |
45a. If one could imagine the European countries joining together to become the Europes United States in the same manner as The United States of America, should Russia, in your opinion, be included? |
| V41 |
45b. Should the East European Countries e.g. Poland, Hungary, Rumania, East Germany, Czechoslovakia etc. be included? |
| V42 |
46a. Do you think that it would be a good idea that the parties Venstre and Konservative should join to one party? |
| V43 |
46b. (If good idea) - Do you think the Radikale should be included in such a union between Venstre and Konservative? |
| V44 |
46c. (If good idea) - Do you think that the Uafhængige should be included in a union between Venstre and Konservative? |
| V45 |
47. In Denmark the state and countries run busi nesses which in some countries are privately run for e.g. railroads, hospitals, power stations, and many others. Would you be a supporter or an opposer of the state taking over the running of more areas of business e.g. banks, insurance companies or others? |
| V46 |
48. (If an opposer) - Do you think that the state should continue the operation of the business which it now runs or do you think it should discontinue these and give over some of these businesses to private hands? |
| V47 |
49. (If supporter) - Do you think that the state should take over practically all business or industry i.e. a real socializing? |
| Løbenummer |
Ikke betydningsbærende unikt løbenummer skabt under aflevering til arkiv |